The Truth About The Creation 
God's Glory, God's Handiwork, God's Word, The Genesis Account
A Dissertation by Pastor Ed Rice January 2017

6: Relativity

Some did not pay close attention in their high school Euclidean Geometry course. Indeed some avoided it all together. The purpose of this section is to overcome that and explore some foundational reasoning for comprehending Albert Einstein’s theories of relativity. The believer in our Lord Jesus Christ wants to comprehend these theories for two reasons. As stated previously, one is challenged to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven; “this is the travail, which God hath given to the sons of men to be exercised in it.” (Ecclesiastes 1:13, 3:10) When asked, “Why climb Mount Everest?” the most common answer is, “Because it is there!” Why learn Einstein’s theories of relativity? Because they are here, and one is tasked to travail and exercise in them.1
Now if that reason does not sufficiently ward off someone’s dread of mathematics and abstract thought consider this: the rebellious heart of man has contrived a notion that he has no Supernatural Creator. He thinks he has arrived on the scene after millions of years of natural selection and natural survival of the fittest. In their natural thinking light left the sun this morning and in eight minutes traveled the 92.96 million miles to get here. So too, they surmise with their logic, light left a supernova, traveled for 168,000 years and arrived at earths telescopes in February of 1987. One can test and explore their first hypothesis and show it a good theory, but their second hypothesis makes our God a deceiver. Our Creator, our Lord Jesus Christ, revealed that he created all things in six-days and rested on the seventh. His revelation shows this creation act occurred in 4,000 BC. Trust Christ. The Bible says, “For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged” (Romans 3:3-4). Blind faith is perfectly adequate for a true believer. Blind faith, however, does not give a logical answer to the naysayers who surround us. In this instance the theories of relativity can be of great help. One need not understand Albert Einstein’s theories of relativity to gain solace. But just comprehending them will improve one's stance on God’s sure foundation. That more sure stance will certainly frustrate any naysayers that one might contend with. Contend for the faith, give an answer for the hope that is in you. Exhort and convince the gainsayers. (Jude 1:3, I Peter 3:15, Titus 1:9) Comprehending these theories of relativity can help.
Albert Einstein wrote the book on Relativity. It is titled “Relativity.”2 Rather than send one off to the library, or to Amazon.com, this work is a re-write of his excellent explanation. He wrote so that university students would comprehend, and so they could understand. He wrote to Bachelor of Science students; this author, in this effort, writes to the high school graduate. He wrote with exacting depth and clarity about the theories he spent his life exploring; this author, writes with less clarity, but much less math, and if one bear with me in this effort the goal can be obtained.
Relative Laws of Euclidean Geometry
Some simple concepts can introduce relativity to the rational thinker. If one recalls anything about Euclidean Geometry, they recall that it dealt with formal proofs and the building of a staircase of knowledge, one step at a time. A first exercise involved the axiom that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. That axiom, assumed as always true, is now known as only relative. It depends on the coordinate system in use. Going from my home to Dundee, New York, is conceivably shorter as the crow flies. They don’t have to go around the lake and two mountains. Going from my home to London, England, however, leaves the simplified plane geometry, a simplified plane where axioms are conceived to always be true, and enters into a spherical geometry where the simple axiom fails. As the crow flies on a straight line, is no longer the shortest distance to London, England.
Notice further in this spherical coordinate system that if I walk due east until I get to the other side of the globe I am still walking due east. If I walk due north until I get to the other side of the globe, however, I have changed my reference (not my direction) and I am walking due south. So too, if I walk due north until I hit the pole, then turn right I am going south. If I continue to the equator and then turn right, I am going west, and if I continue on I can eventually turn right to end where I started. It is thus possible, in a spherical coordinate system, to pace out a triangle that contains three 90 degree turns. One cannot do that in plane geometry, there are laws of Euclidean Geometry which forbid it. Those laws are relative, here, relative to one's coordinate system. Space is not the final frontier, but space is surely found in some sort of a spherical coordinate system. Space is therefore, removed from the laws that one contrives in a simple planar coordinate system.
Relative Laws of Motion
Albert Einstein loves the following type of illustration, bear with me if I do too. A man is in a car of a speeding train, he tosses a ball up in the air, he perceives it going straight up, stopping, and falling straight back down where he catches it. On a platform watching the train go by, a man perceives the same ball arching up in a circle, then arching back down. It follows an arching pattern. One can conceive that straight line motions are relative to the relative motions between two simple plane coordinate systems. If one of these moving coordinate systems was a spherical coordinate system, or if one coordinate system was rotating in reference to the ball, even more profound dimensions of relativity would be added to the rise and fall of the ball. Conceiving all this relativity is profound, and this analysis has, thus far, been kept profoundly simple. Take yet another step into relativity.
Relative Laws of Velocity
What has been examined so far, the relativity our reference system, has been conceivable with only a little strain on our understanding. In considering velocity, and particularly the velocity of light, that strain might increase, so bear with this next illustration. One cannot improve on Albert Einstein’s explanations and illustrations in this arena. To follow them, however, we need to grapple with the Lorentz Transformation.3 I want to make this understandable to those who do not have four years of college math in their background, but I want to keep Einstein’s exactness intact. The Lorentz Transformation transforms from a fixed frame to a moving frame. That transformation, shown below, details how a moving frame, designated with prime signs ( ' ), moves with velocity v, in the x direction. Notice that the x dimension and the time dimension both warp because of this velocity.

Figure 15 Fixed Frame to Moving Frame of the Lorentz Transformationch6Figure 15 Lorentz Transformation

The Lorentz Transform equations help those who follow them, but Einstein's illustration will help all of us. Imagine a mile long train hurtling down a straight section of track at a breakneck speed, a man in the caboose, positioned so he can see the engine is just now hurtling past a man on the bank who can also view the engine. At that instant a bolt of lightning strikes a tree right beside the engine. Get this scenario firmly implanted in the brain. The engine and the lightning bolt are exactly one mile from both men. The train and the man in the train's caboose are moving at breakneck speed relative to the man on the bank. Analyze the next few microseconds very carefully.
The flash of light emitted from the lightning bolt begins a one mile trek towards the man on the bank. As it speeds towards him the man on the train is speeding towards the flash of light and gets closer to it. I have the train traveling at breakneck speed so one can easily concede that when the flash of light intercepts the man on the train, he is significantly closer to the lightning struck tree than is the stationary man on the bank. One would then rationalize that the man on the train would see the flash of light an instant or two before the man on the bank sees the flash of light. Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity says, no, no, that is not so. The speed of light is finite and constant at a speed we call c. It is not at all relative to the velocity of the reference sending it or receiving it. It is forever constant at speed c.
This will not make rational sense. The illustrations just given, Albert Einstein’s illustration without all the mathematics, is about to show some things that truly boggle the mind. The whole concept hangs on two principles. First, that light does have a finite velocity. My older brother said he could click off the light and be under the bed covers before it got dark in the room. I was young, so I believed him. I have never had trouble with the fact that light takes time to propagate through space.
I was told in high school that the first rays of Sun light that hit me in the morning, left that burning ball of helium and took eight minutes to get to Earth before I could see them. For me this is perfectly conceivable, but since I have run into Christians who did not believe it as quickly, I have included a later chapter on how one discovers and measures the speed of light. It is fascinating. Understand here that it does take a measurable amount of time for light to propagate through open space; it does have a measurable velocity. The second principle is a little more profound.
Light travels through open space at a constant rate c, no matter how fast you might be traveling in that open space. Let me illustrate this truth with a story. When I was a teen I had two best friends, Chucky and Jimmy. Chucky not only had a driver's license, he also had a Chevy. Steuben County had put brand new stop signs on every rural dirt road in our township. We, as teens, found it entertaining to hit them with a rock as Chucky drove by at 50 mph. I am not a pitcher, but say I can chuck a rock out of a car window at 20 mph.
One night it was Jimmy’s shot. He flung the rock from the back window of the Chevy. The rock hit the sign at 70 mph. That makes sense since the car was going 50 mph, and Jimmy's rock was thrown at 20 mph. The rock, thrown from the car, is going 70 mph when it hits the sign. The sign catches the rock on its very edge and wings it back at us at 70 mph, but we are still going 50 mph. The rock goes by my ear at 120 mph, that’s its velocity going south plus our velocity going north. When it hit Jimmy in the back seat of the Chevy and broke his jaw and two molars, it was going very, very fast. Normal relative velocities add, but light is not at all like that.
When the beam from Chucky's headlight hits a stop sign, the light waves hit at speed c. If he is going 300 mph, or 2 mph, the light propagates from his high beams at speed c, and hits the sign at speed c. One would think that it would hit the stop sign at speed c + 300 mph. It does not, it only goes at its top speed c, and the 300 mph cannot add to that speed. Thus the light leaves his high beam and hits the stop sign at speed c, even if he drives by at 300 mph. If this headlight were attached to a spacecraft traveling at an inconceivable speed, the light waves leave the lens at speed c and they intercept any incoming meteorite at speed c. If the spacecraft had taillights, light waves travel off to the rear at speed c.
The speed of light in space is forever a constant, and c = 300,000,000 m/sec. Whether it is leaving an object or bumping an object its speed is c. This is not intuitive. One can get a running head start and throw a javelin faster and farther. When one gets a running head start with a flash light, however, the beam of light does not go any faster. Relative velocity does not add or subtract from the speed of light. Okay, let’s go back to Einstein’s lightning flash and the speeding train.
The speed of light is constant no matter the relative speed of any other object. The flash of light leaves the burning tree at speed c, then a microsecond later, it intercepts the man on the bank at speed c. But at the exact same time it travels the shorter distance to the man in the caboose. The distance is shorter because the train moved towards the strike for that microsecond. At the same instant that the man on the bank sees the flash, the man in the caboose sees the flash. For the man in the caboose, the light traveled the 1 mile from the engine to the caboose. For the man on the bank the light traveled the 1 mile from the tree to his position. You and I know that the distance from the tree to the caboose was less than 1 mile because of its relative motion. The light traveled less distance at the constant velocity, and thus it took more time. Time and distance are relative while the speed of light is forever constant. Thus time warped and distance warped to accommodate the constant speed of light.
Without laboring through all the proofs and all the math, let us understand the two things that happen when things start moving very, very fast. First, the relative distance for a moving object begins to shrink. At conceivable speeds it is an imperceptible shrinkage, but that 100 mph fastball is actually smaller than that official hardball held by the umpire. Some batter might swear to that, but it is, as we say, imperceptible at our minute velocities.
Probably the most conceivable example of this truth is found in Bohr’s model of the atom. Protons and neutrons are particles in the nucleus, and the electrons are moving very very fast in a synchronized orbit. Let's propose that the proton and the electron are the same size but the electron is moving around the nucleus at such breakneck speed that it appears to be imperceptibly small. A nuclear physics example might not intrigue everyone, but it is an exciting illustration for some of us. Also consider that the seconds of time must tick by slower for the moving object. Again, this is not intuitively obvious, nor is it naturally conceivable. The shrinking distance and the slowing time clock are both understood by abstract reasoning. We have no concrete example where this might be observed.
When God said, “Let there be light,” he created light with some powerful and astounding attributes. Recall that he said, “It was good.” The naturalist who pretends that God’s creation came into existence by simple natural causes is befuddled by some of these more complex considerations. The bombardier beetle might embarrass their biological survival of the fittest hypothesis, but Einstein’s theory of relativity can confound everything they stand on; especially their supposition that it took 13 billion years for some light rays to reach our Hubble Telescope. This is some real profound stuff.
Okay, at this point if one can comprehend the Lorentz Transformation equations, go read Einstein’s Book, “Relativity.” The rest will struggle through another illustration that might make a purist of purer mathematicians angry, but it clarifies the concept well.
The lightning flash leaves the burning tree and speeding train engine at speed c. It travels the one mile to the fellow on the embankment in time t. When he sees the flash it hits him at speed c. It also travels the one mile to the fellow in the caboose in time t. A mile is 5,280 feet. Let us imagine that the fellow on the train moved that 280 feet in time t. No matter what his relative velocity might be, the light hits him at speed c, and traveled one mile to do it. For the moving man the mile is shorter, and the time clicks by slower. Herein is the profound point, it takes time t to get to him. The only way that this is possible is if the one mile distance for the moving man is shorter by the 280 feet. But the speed is still constant, so the distance, to him is still one mile. Also consider that the flash of light arrives at both men at the same instant. We reason that it should have reached the moving man sooner, or in less time. The only way that this could be, is if time ticks at a slower rate in the moving train.
This imperative is not intuitive. It is not perceptible in any natural phenomena that man can observe. It is unnatural, but very real, and in God’s creation, very good. Let us say it again, when one man is moving towards the coming flash of light, relative to the other man, the moving man's clock ticks slower than the stationary man’s clock, and the moving man's mile is shorter than the stationary man's mile. The greater the relative velocity, the slower the moving man's clock ticks, and the shorter is his mile. That is profound. Now let's approach the speed of light; it is a boundary condition where distance disappears, and time stops. That is more profound. It is the subject of a myriad of science fiction stories. It is not, however, a subject treated at all by an atheistic evolutionist and it throws a wrench in their mandate for billions of years.
When there is relative motion and a constant speed of light, distance is relative and warps, and time becomes relative and clicks by differently, i.e. time is warped. Since the speed of light c, is the distance divided by time, one would expect this inverse relationship. The ratio of the changes can be more exactly found with the Lorentz Transformation equations. In this setting, without all the mathematics, a Christian can see that light emitted by a star hurtling through space at an unimaginable speed, does not necessarily reach our little planet on anyone's artificially simplified time schedule. Our little planet is also hurtling through space, and in a solar system which is hurtling through space. Be assured that with all this relative motion there is little scientific basis to presume that a super nova, occurred 168,000 years ago just because it may have been 168,000 light years away. Just Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity assure us that the atheist's argument about time has questionable scientific basis. The warping of space and time is terminology introduced in this analysis of the special theory of relativity, but the full blown warping of the time-space-matter continuums receives its full application in the general theory of relativity when the affects of gravity are included. Atheistic evolutionists only measure things with Newtonian minds, in their limited Gaussian coordinates where the speed of light times time gives us exact distances. Such is not necessarily the case in the outer regions of God's universe.
We do not, however, have the basis to refute all their thinking based on only the special theory of relativity. We must take a step or two into Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity in order to comprehend the enormity of God’s creation and the exaggerated, over simplified atheist's reasoning about time and space.
A Constant Speed of Light “in Vacuo”
God created light with this attribute, it travels “in vacuo”4 at a constant speed, and when it intercepts an object, no matter the relative velocity of that object, the light is intercepted at that constant speed. The speed of light being roughly 186,000 miles per second (300,000,000 m/sec) is not the amazing thing in this attribute. The stunning discovery is that it intercepts each object at that speed, regardless of any relative motion between objects. That is so profound that I would ask the Bible believers to rehearse the previous illustration again, and then say out loud again, “As one approaches the speed of light distance disappears, and time stands still.” That is just the special theory of relativity.
The man on a speeding train and the man setting at the railroad crossing sees the flash of the lightning at the exact same instant. Let's say the flash traveled the mile to the crossing and the half mile to speeding passengers at a constant speed and hit each eye after 0.186 micro seconds. Such a thing is only possible if the relative motion of the train caused the measure of distance and the tick of the clock to be shortened. If one has comprehended that, one comprehends Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity. And we did it without all the mathematics involved for understanding the Lorentz Transform equations. Motion makes distance shrink and time stretch. Go figure (or in Hebrew Selah). Let me say it once more, slowly. Motion makes distance shrink and time stretch. That is profound.
Armed with this knowledge one might try racing all the faster to their next late appointment. The more relative speed one has, the shorter the distance and the slower their watch ticks. One could shave micro inches off their distance and nano seconds off of their tardiness. Please do not try this at home, leave it for your next space voyage. Likely at the Rapture.
Gravity in the More General Theory
Comprehending the more general theory of relativity without all the math, Galilean reference domains, and Gaussian coordinate systems was never attempted by Albert Einstein. It is attempted here because the author is a systems engineer and not a genius. Einstein’s special theory is called special, because it only answers for the special, or most simple, situation. Even so, it has brought all the classical laws of mechanical motions under great suspicion. It has shown that such rules do not likely apply in the outer regions of the expanding space. It is becoming obvious that there are some “fundamental difficulties attending classical celestial mechanics.” Albert Einstein documents these in his Chapter 30 “Cosmological Difficulties of Newton’s Theory.”5 Indeed, all the general laws of mechanics and motions are now more like Jello nailed to crumbling walls than like firmed up laws applicable throughout God’s universe.
To take a step closer to the more general theory of relativity one must deal with gravity and its very complex relationship to speed and light. Einstein does this with two remarkable illustrations that will be utilized without all of his mathematics.
Consider first that one's velocity in space, interacting with the constant speed of light, has revealed some profound principles about time and distance. These principles take hold when traveling through God’s vast universe. Ergo, all of our Newtonian and Galilean laws need to be revisited. They are “Law” for only the most simplistic coordinates in our own little solar system, which is likely hurtling through space, all while undergoing great acceleration. Now consider that acceleration, as we understand it, causes a change in a bodies velocity. It was shown previous that a relative velocity changes both time and distance. Note the dynamics we are about to encounter. A velocity changes space and time as we understand them, acceleration is a changing velocity, and thus it changes the changes of both the space and the time continuums. Go figure.
Gravity makes acceleration. The units for an acceleration are distance per time squared. The gravity, here on God’s Earth, causes an acceleration on a falling rock equivalent to 32 feet per second squared. Put a pin in two thoughts here, #1 Gravity produces acceleration and #2 acceleration has units containing time squared. Recall from a previous chapter that squaring an imaginary number produces a real component and that God’s universe has ample applications for imaginary numbers in both time and space. Hold that thought for a later more in depth consideration. Let’s now explore some concepts about gravity.
O LORD, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom hast thou made them all: the earth is full of thy riches. So is this great and wide sea, wherein are things creeping innumerable, both small and great beasts. There go the ships: there is that leviathan, whom thou hast made to play therein. These wait all upon thee; that thou mayest give them their meat in due season. That thou givest them they gather: thou openest thine hand, they are filled with good. Thou hidest thy face, they are troubled: thou takest away their breath, they die, and return to their dust. Thou sendest forth thy spirit, they are created: and thou renewest the face of the earth.
The glory of the LORD shall endure for ever: the LORD shall rejoice in his works. He looketh on the earth, and it trembleth: he toucheth the hills, and they smoke. I will sing unto the LORD as long as I live: I will sing praise to my God while I have my being. My meditation of him shall be sweet: I will be glad in the LORD. Let the sinners be consumed out of the earth, and let the wicked be no more. Bless thou the LORD, O my soul. Praise ye the LORD (Psalm 104:24-35).

Gravity produces acceleration and acceleration produce gravity. Albert Einstein spent much of his genius focused on the phenomena of gravity. Ponder with him that the inertial mass of a body is identical to the gravitational mass of a body and begin to see his fascination. In his circle every rational mind that is worth its salt must ask the question, “Why is this so?” In other circles there are rational minds who never pondered gravity at all. I would like to welcome some readers to Albert’s world for these next few pages of this work.
Albert pictures a room placed in the outer reaches of space. A man and the room furnishings float about in weightlessness until a rope is attached to a hook on the top of the room. Albert Einstein colorfully states it as, “To the middle of the lid of the (room) is fixed externally a hook with rope attached, and now a ‘being’ (what kind of being is immaterial to us) begins pulling at this with a constant force. The (room) together with the observer (and its contents) then begins to move ‘upwards’ with a uniformly accelerated motion.”6
Picture now what happens inside the room. The man and room furnishings, which were previously weightless, “fall” to the “floor” of the room. The man stands, straightens up the chair, table and lamp, and perceives that he has been placed in some sort of gravitational field. He reaches into his pocket, pulls out a quarter and tosses it lightly in the air to assess its “weight.” He holds it at eye level, releases it and watches it “fall” to the floor and bounce under the table. Indeed, this is a gravitational field just like I knew on planet earth. He looks outside to see what is holding up his room and sees the hook and rope. His room is hanging by this rope in a gravitational field. It is all so obvious.
As an observer, outside of the room, one knows that the man is wrong. There is no gravitational field. There is only a constant force producing continual acceleration. One must sympathize with his blunder however. Every thing that the man observes in his room is identical to what we might observe while hanging in a room here in Earth’s gravitational field. Inertial mass and gravitational mass are indeed identical properties. Ergo, gravity is forever directly connected to an acceleration of mass.
Consider now the far reaching consequences of this relationship. If a relative velocity causes space to shrink and time to slow down, what might a relative acceleration do? With his illustration Albert Einstein forever links acceleration with gravity. Given the special theory of relativity, consider that acceleration, being an increase in a relative velocity, would bring about both an increasing shrinkage in space and an increasing lagging in time. Without walking through all his math and complex transformations we have conceptually gone from the special theory to a more general consideration that includes gravity. Stated again, a gravitational field (acting as would an invisible acceleration) causes a change in time and a change in distance. The greater the gravitational field, the greater the changes. In this effort I cannot communicate all the complexity of the relationships between the tick of a clock, the size of a measuring rod, a relative motion, the speed of light, and now the effects of a gravitational field. I only wish to convey that God created, out of nothing, a very complex relationship. When he transformed a tiny spec of his energy into a time, space, and matter continuum, he left a relativity between each continuum. Mere humans can only begin to comprehend the interrelations that are unfolding around us every day. Indeed, the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament sheweth his handwork!7
When mere man wholly denies the revelation of the LORD God, and sets his heart on proving that God’s universe came into being by nothing but natural processes, then “He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.”8 Christians, I mean the true believers, not the Roman religionist, can lighten up, and laugh a little. God does hold the Ph.D.s in derision. The professed atheists with their natural models, promoting natural selection and random chances taking billions of years, are all in derision. Government sponsored space probes are sent out to find the origins of life, and the cause of the big bang. These constitute their foolishness and their derision. They have not allowed for a single aspect of these theories of relativity and the effects on their long imagined history of time. Warp drives in Star Trek, Luke Skywalker's time dilation, and Interstellar's worm holes, expose more true science than Darwinian evolutionist portraying billions of years in fictitious time. Look at the detailed research because of the fictitious Luke and Leah twins:
According to calculations in a paper from the Journal of Interdisciplinary Science Topics — published by geeky physics students at the University of Leicester — time dilation means that the Skywalker twins cannot possibly be the same age anymore.
The paper gives an example from The Empire Strikes Back:
Consider the separate journeys that both twins make to Cloud City. Leia travels from the neighbouring system of Anoat, while Luke travels from the much more distant planet Dagobah. Luke’s journey was ~7 days travel in his own reference frame, which was estimated to be 25 times longer than Leia’s, making her journey 0.28 days (6.72 hours) in her own reference frame.”
If Leia, in the Millennium Falcon, is traveling at 99.999% the speed of light* and Luke is traveling in an X-wing at 99.995% (the small difference matters a lot), then during Leia’s 7-hour trip the galaxy ages 62.6 days, and during Luke’s 7-day trip outside observers age 701 days (nearly 2 years). This means that when the twins first see each other on Lando’s floating palace, Luke is now 638 days younger than his twin. Oh, and that also means Darth Vader was waiting at that dinner table for a long, long time.9

Sci-fi shows more credibility than the atheistic evolutionist and God holds the evolutionist in derision, i.e. contemptuous jeering laughter. Now the atheistic evolutionists have found that God has placed a black-hole in the middle of every galaxy he created. What stifles outright laughter is the depraved tenacity which causes them to hold to their flawed Godless hypothesis. The deception they have pumped into society is also troubling. They have so invested in their fraud that they can only save face because they started their lies in our public kindergartens. But there is more bad news for them in this arena.
Rotation Produces Gravity and Gravity Produces Rotation
Psalm 9:1 I will praise thee, O LORD, with my whole heart; I will shew forth all thy marvelous works.

It has already been established that going from a plane coordinate system, where laws of Euclidean Geometry are built and comprehended, into a spherical coordinate system, allows for the bending and warping of some rigid laws which, in their place, have been held as unbreakable. The special theory of relativity works via the Lorentz Transform, in a rigid planer coordinate system that contains no rotational motions. Since stars and planets play out in a spherical coordinate system, rotating on an axis, and orbiting around a rotating, and orbiting sun or black hole, let's rotate things a little. The special theory of relativity warps time and distance in the rigid planer coordinate system, it goes much further when rotations are included.
Before rotating allow me to express a word about what I expect this analysis to do for us. In locked horn disagreement we have two world views. The one says, “In the beginning God created,” the other says, “There was no real beginning, and everything is here by simple natural processes.” There are a myriad of mixed multitudes wandering around between these two views, and they say something like, “Can’t we all get along?” and “Don’t we all worship the same god anyway?” Placating to this mixed multitude moves a Bible believer away from the truth. There is only a precious remnant still staunchly standing on the truth, and this effort is promoting that those standing there have nothing to be embarrassed about.
Only Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity has put some natural laws, laws that big bang evolutionists use in their “all natural – no Supernatural” hypothesizing, on unstable ground. Add to all that some analysis of what happens when rotation is added and the naturalist's unstable ground begins a sort of twisted shaking. Rotation is related to gravity; consequentially it is a major consideration in the general theory of relativity. Their whole house of cards might go tumbling when the atheistic, all-naturalistic, evolutionists experience relative twisting and shaking of their ground rules. It will not, of course, actually fall. They will steady it with care. It is held together by diabolical hands that they cannot see. For the believer, however, I would provide the more assurance that when one is standing on God’s Word as truth, they dare not lean on, or stand close to this house of cards. In God’s final chapter it will all fall.
What’s more, it is not the believer’s job to knock down the atheists’ house of cards nor to put them in derision. God will do that in his own time. The believer is commissioned to preach the gospel to every creature. It behooves the believer to be wise about the world’s rebellion and deceit, and to expose it, and even refute it soundly when it comes to preaching the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. In that vein there is nothing in God's universe that is not caught up in some sort of rotation, so consider this important aspect in Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
Consider again Albert Einstein’s little room in the outer reaches of space. Again a very long rope is attached to the hook at the top, but this time instead of applying a force, there is a “being” (what kind of being is still immaterial to us) who begins to swing the room around in a giant circle. The man and the room furnishings, which were previously floating about in weightlessness, “fall” to the “floor” of the room. The man stands, straightens up the chair, table, and lamp, and perceives that he has been placed in some sort of gravitational field. He reaches into his pocket, pulls out a nickel and tosses it lightly into the air to assess its “weight”. He holds it at chin level, releases it and watches it “fall” to the floor, and bounce under the chair. Indeed it is a gravitational field just like he knew on the planet Earth. He looks outside to see what is holding up his room and sees the hook and rope. His room is hanging by this rope in this mysterious gravitational field. It is all so obvious.
As an observer outside the room, one knows that the man is wrong. There is no gravitational field. There is only a constant rotation producing a centrifugal force, and this force is perceived as gravity. Everything that the man observes inside this room is identical to what one might observe while standing in a room here in Earth’s gravitational field. Not only are inertial mass and gravitational mass identical, but now gravity, acceleration of a mass, and somehow the rotation of a mass around a center point are all profoundly interrelated in some kind of interconnection. In this profound relationship one produces, or mimics, the other, and the other mimics, or produces, the one.
Take pause for a moment here for the Bible believing audience to ponder the profoundness in what was just developed. Gravity, acceleration and rotation are interconnected in a complex triune relationship. In this triune relationship they cannot be separated from each other in effect, but they are separate and distinguishable entities. Such triune relationships are everywhere in the exploration of God’s created universe. They are completely and forever wasted on the secular genius like Stephen Hawking who may lack the diabolical gumption to completely deny the existence of God, but is not student enough of God’s holy inflatable, inerrant Word to capture the connection to his trinity. We are considering the complex interrelationships between God’s three-dimensional space continuums, God’s three states of matter in continuums, and God’s three tenses of time in continuums. The serious student of the LORD God, who comprehends his own likeness in body, soul, and spirit, collects these triune relationships in the back corners of his mind. Mass, space and time are able to disappear into gravity in a transformation barely comprehended. Such profound trinity relationships are not coincidence for the Bible student. An incomplete, but awesome compilation of such trinity relationships is given by Dr. Grady in his book, “Given by Inspiration.”10 But here, take particular note that mass, space, and time interrelate with gravity via this barely comprehensible theory of relativity.
Consider where all this theorizing about relativity leaves the sincere student of the Bible. We have surmised that changing relative velocity changes our time and space reference; acceleration even more so changes our time and space reference, and it produces gravity effects; rotation produces gravity effects as well, and it changes our time and space reference. Lastly gravity itself, because of its direct relationship with mass and acceleration, changes our time and space reference. Time, mass, space, and energy are all relative. When one is squeezed it gushes out into another. Relativity declares that the relationships between these entities is very complex and not nearly understood by the normal finite mind.
The fact that time itself is tangled into every consideration of these relativity equations brings us tremendous insight. God said, “Beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (2 Pet 3:8).11 When man takes one small step outside of our own solar system, what he fathoms about distance and what he assumes about time is nothing more than speculation. When he steps outside of our own Milky Way galaxy and his wandering telescope explores distant galaxies, evolutionists do not consider God's words, “For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night” (Ps 90:4).
These theories of relativity wherein space and time, mass and energy intersect intrinsically, are not given the least consideration by science-so-called. For a Bible believer it is ennobling to make these observations about black-holes and relativity. Science-so-called cannot accept that God created the world out of nothing, nor will they grapple with Albert Einstein's theories of relativity. They make observations inside God's amazing universe, but do not consider relativity of space and time at all. Consequently, the black-holes that God created as the centerpiece of each of his galaxies, have them in derision. The best explanation that they can muster for these black-holes, is that an anomaly of gravity is compressing vast quantities of mass into a dot smaller than the period at the end of this sentence. They go on to suppose this over compressed hyper gravitized spec is somehow setting itself up for a big bang of its own. Perhaps it will spawn into its own randomly created universe someday, they say. Their wild hypothesizing (please don't call it theorizing) about these newly discovered black-holes (only discovered as centerpieces in each galaxy in 199212) demonstrates the depth of their derision.
Consider what the Bible believer armed with Albert Einstein's theories of relativity can theorize about black-holes. God spoke the universe into existence and created it out of nothing, and God said so. By him all things consist and he said so. If he should take some of the matter he created, unravel it, turn it into nothing, and allow some of its energy to escape as an unparalleled gravitational field, one might observe a black-hole. And one might hear the LORD and his anointed sitting in the heavens with a laugh aimed at the atheistic evolutionist.
Since the day in 1960 when this author was quickened (Eph 2) and had my blinded eyes open to see (John 9), I have had no problem conceiving and believing this scenario. Since I understood Albert Einstein's theories of relativity, I have been able to add considerable reason and logic to that faith. Out of nothing, God created time, space, and matter. They are all interrelated and he can display them or dismantle them in any fashion he chooses, for “by him all things consist” (Col 1:17). Further, consider what science-so-called speculates about time and space. Every time they build a bigger telescope, which can see into a more distant galaxy, they speculate that their hypothesized big bang must have happened a million or more years earlier than they thought previously. They speculate so, because they have no regard for Albert Einstein's theories of relativity. They suppose light, in the outer regions of the universe, follows the same linear laws that it follows here on Earth. That sort of reckoning has led them to believe that the universe is more than a billion years old! They insist, that since their estimation puts a sited galaxy a billion light years away, then it took a billion years for that light to get here. Further, they reckon that when they stare at the galaxy, they are looking back in time, and eventually in so doing, they might discover how the big bang started all this. They are in derision.
Time and space, matter and energy are not simple linear relationships as evolutionists suppose. They are complex, interrelated, relative relationships. When one is squeezed it gushes out into another. When one uses the Creators time formula on the science-so-called's linear time estimation, a billion years is only a million days, and it only took 2,700 years for that light to get here. I'm just saying, the Bible believer has nothing to apologize for when he tenaciously holds to God's word. It says that the LORD God created the world in 6 days, and he did it 6,01913 years ago.
Most scholars despise Ussher, this author loves him. Scholars scoffed Ussher's genius and discarded all his work because he projected the precise date of creation. His exuberant and exhaustive 17thrd of 4004 BC. Do not dismiss Ussher's meticulous investigations because he was enthusiastic about his profound mathematics. He understood Bible dates and calendars far better than most, and he believed more Bible than any of those scoffing modernist scholars. If one does not want to hold to Ussher's logic that all the planets would have been neatly aligned at creation then let them come up with their own reasoning, but his chronology of years is still impeccable.
In side note, modernist opinion points out that “Ussher’s precise reckoning is an illusion, because of known gaps in the genealogies and translation errors. For example, the birthdate of many patriarchs was changed by 100 years by the scribes that produced the Septuagint. Other chronologists have estimated the age of creation to be in a range of 6-10,000 years.” This author can contend fluently that the Septuagint is a farce, and a farce is “A comedy characterized by broad satire and improbable situations,” or, “A mixture of ground raw chicken and mushrooms with pistachios and truffles and onions and parsley and lots of butter and bound with eggs!”14 The Septuagint is of the world, produced by Egypt in Alexandria. Anything produced by the world, in Egypt, God's portrayal of the world, should not be trusted by the believer.15 Allow me to reiterate Ussher's two strong points, he understood Bible dates and calendars, and he believed his Bible. That is to say, he believed his Hebrew Old Testament and his Greek New Testament without any criticism, lower or higher, source or redaction, textual or form! None, notta, zip. ALL Bible criticisms attack the veracity of the inerrant, infallible, verbally inspired Holy Word of God. There is no cause whatsoever to trust anything from Alexandria Egypt especially what is called the Septuagint. Anything recovered from Egypt is tainted with worldliness, to include every copyright modernist English bible version derived from Wescott-Hort and Septuagint. When young Earth enthusiasts extend their scholarly opinions beyond God's 6,000 year old record they do so because of modernist opinions and Bible criticisms.
When one comprehends Albert Einstein's theories of relativity, a 6,019 year old universe has more compelling evidence than does any multi-billion year estimate. Trust God's word. Nay sayers will naysay. Blessed are all they that put their trust in God's Son (cf. Psalm 2:12). “I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes” (Matt 11:25). God is specific and exact, “He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing” (Job 26:7).
Gravity Effects Time
Because gravity causes acceleration, and acceleration increases relative velocity, gravity changes the rate of a clock and the size of an object. Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity advances that relative velocity, because the speed of light is constant, and because of the Lorentz transform, causes both the ticks of a clock and the distance of measure to vary. This is a profound discovery, and now a proven truth. One of the more obscure tentacles of this truth is that gravity itself must change the ticking rate of a clock, and the distances we perceive as real.
The non genius will not generally get as enamored with gravity as Albert Einstein was, but it is well worth some consideration. Albert Einstein was enthralled with discovering the intricacies of gravity. God created the universe and then glued it together with gravity. One speaks of a gravitational field as if they understand it like one does an electrical field or magnetic field, but they cannot steer or control gravity like they do electric and magnetic fields. The most enthralling thing about gravity is that it is in perfect union with a mass's inertia. Why? How? What is the law which connects them?
In the 1830's Michael Faraday assembled some of Gods laws of electro-magnetic induction. In the 1860's James Maxwell discovered the equations which united God's electricity and magnetism. They are still called Maxwell's Equations, known and loved by every electrical engineer. In the1880's Heinrich Hertz confirmed that light itself followed Maxwell's equations and most often behaved itself like an electro-magnetic wave. Hertz and Maxwell presumed that light always followed their laws and equations.
It was not until Albert Einstein reformulated Max Planck's early twentieth century quantum mechanics into a more robust quantum theory that they were shown wrong. That theory explained the photo electric effect wherein previous laws were found somewhat inadequate. Sorta like, what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, Albert Einstein accounted for with the theory of quantum physics (Please excuse the theological parallel in that analogy, it seemed appropriate).
But the German genius of the 20th century, when he pondered gravity, was unable to quantify in law or in equations or in principle, anything similar to Maxwell's tremendous breakthrough for electromagnetic phenomena. As much as electronic forces were directly connected to magnetic forces, so to should gravity and inertia connect into what one might call Einstein's Equations. But alas, we have no such understanding. Gravity, the glue that God uses to hold his universe together, and inertia, the law that God uses to keep bodies in motion... or not, is a mystery to finite man. All the genius of Albert Einstein could not quantify the field effect of gravity. He could not explain the propagation of gravity. He could not measure the speed of gravity. The best that the genius could do was slip gravity into his theory of relativity and conclude that gravity warps time and space, light and distance, in a way that man might never comprehend.
Gravity changes time and distance and somehow the whole continuum of time, of space and of matter, the three continuums God created out of nothing with the first seven words of the Holy Bible. The three created continuums are all connected to gravity with an uncertain relativity. When Stephen Hawking publishes, “A Brief History of Time, from the Big Bang to Black Holes,” it is based on the perspective that light travels through the outer regions of space following the same laws that light obeys in Earth's laboratories. That satisfies the evolutionist, the atheist and the agnostic, but God, Albert Einstein and I contend that somewhere out there, on the borders of a finite universe, a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a single day. Gravity, the unquantified force in God's universe changes the tick on a time clock, just as a relative velocity, and relative acceleration does. It turns out, “the heavens declare the glory of Gods; and the firmament showeth his handwork” (Ps 19). The atheist who ignores the theories of relativity cannot begin to account for the wonder that is out there.
century calculations of planet positions and his modulus seven math is still undisputed. It caused Ussher to believe God began his creation on an autumnal equinox on Sunday, October 23
1 cf. Eccl 1:13, 3:10
2 Albert Einstein, “Relativity” (Three River Press, New York, NY, 1961 ISBN 0-517-88 491-0)
3 Ibid., 34
4 Vacuo is a German transliteration of vacuum framed and popularized by Albert Einstein. Well at least framed by him. It is used here to honor and remember the genius.
5 Albert Einstein, “Relativity, The Special and the General Theory” (Three Rivers Press, NY, NY, 1961), 119
6 Ibid., Chapter -The Equals of Inertial and Gravitational Mass, 75
7 Psalm 19
8 Psalm 2
9 “Why the Skywalker Twins Aren't the Same Age Anymore,” Posted by Kyle Hill on November 29, 2014, Nerdist by Chris Hardwick, http://nerdist.com/why-the-skywalker-twins-arent-the-same-age-anymore/ (accessed 1Jan 2016).
10 William Grady, Given by Inspiration (Grady Publications Inc., Swartz Creek, MI, 2010), 87
11 This reference about a day and a thousand years has no place or application in God's Genesis account's creation day, or in God's promise that Christ will reign from His holy hill of Zion for 1,000 years. It has everything to do with the relativity of time in an infinite God's perspective.
12 Robert Irion, “Homing in on BLACK HOLES”, Smithsonian, Vol 39, # 1, (April 2008), 45
13 The 6,019, allows AD 2016 plus Ussher's 4004 years BC, less 1 year because there is no zero BC in the Julian Calendar.
14 Dictionary WordWeb-8, Copyright by Antony Lewis 2015, from WordNet database Copyright 2006 by Princeton Univeristy, s.v. “farce.”
15 Allow this author to rehearse here, that modernist scholars, who think they can repair the uninspired bibles that God could not preserve, use two NT manuscripts that come from the world of Alexandria Egypt as their primary source. They produce worldly copyright bible versions by the hundreds.


To Continue in this series click the link below:
7: Relativity and the Age of Rocks. . . 133 www.truthaboutthechrist.com/thetruthaboutthecreation/7age_of_rocks.html
. . . RATE casts doubt on three radiometric assumptions. . . 134
. . . Radioisotope Dating Methods. . . 136
. . . Relativity Changes Atomic Clocks. . . 139
. . . Cesium Clock Measures Relativity Time Changes. . . 140
. . . Radioactivity, Relativity, The Flood and the Age of Rocks. . . 141
. . . Why Bother About the Age of Rocks. . . 146

God's Glory, God's Handiwork, God's Word, The Genesis Account
Series Complete Table of Contents